Chief Justice Malaba issues a controversial directive

Chief Justice Malaba issues a controversial directive
Published: 17 August 2018 (410 Views)
CHIEF Justice Luke Malaba yesterday issued a controversial directive which shocked a meeting of lawyers for the applicant and respondents, as well as one candidate in the recent disputed presidential election, in the case in which main opposition leader Nelson Chamisa is challenging President-elect Emmerson Mnnagagwa's hotly-disputed victory.

The case will be heard at the Constitutional Court (ConCourt) starting next Wednesday at 10am.

The matter - which has far-reaching implications for Mnangagwa's presidency and the nation's politics and future - might be broadcast live if an application for that is filed or a request is made in writing to the ConCourt and granted.

Chamisa is challenging Mnangagwa's contentious win, saying it was secured through manipulation, irregularities and fraud, charges the president-elect denies. Mnangagwa won with a wafer-thin 50,8%, while Chamisa got 44,3%. The remainder of the vote went to 21 other candidates.

The case started on a dramatic note yesterday during a meeting on preparations and procedures, setting the stage for a bruising and explosive battle which may leave Zimbabwe deeply divided and stuck in a deepening legitimacy crisis.

Judiciary sources said Malaba stunned the meeting attended by Chamisa and Mnangagwa's lawyers, as well as some respondents when he gave an "extraordinary directive" that any respondent who would want to make a submission supporting Chamisa in the case will not be allowed to do so.

However, any respondent backing Mnangagwa will be allowed to make a submission without any problem. Malaba did not explain why. Those in the meeting did not ask why either, sources said.

Lawyers said it was unprecedented and unheard of that a judge, let alone a chief justice, would brazenly want to manage and even influence a major case like that through such an intervention. They said his directive is being studied and could be legally challenged.

The order came as Mnangagwa's attorneys and the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (Zec) boss Justice Priscilla Chigumba scrambled for technical reasons to get Malaba and the ConCourt bench to refuse to hear Chamisa's case or dismiss it on technicalities. Some of the technicalities being brandished include that the application was filed late, is incomplete, defective or invalid. Alternatively, they say it has no merit and must be dismissed.

Chamisa, however, insists he has overwhelming evidence of flaws, unlawful activities and criminalities - massive rigging - which influenced the outcome of the election.

United Democratic Party leader Daniel Shumba, a losing candidate and respondent in the case who was at the meeting yesterday, confirmed Malaba's directive.

"We attended a preparatory meeting where there was the applicant (Chamisa)'s lawyers, the first respondent (Mnangagwa)'s attorneys, Zec representatives and myself, among others," Shumba said in an interview with the Zimbabwe Independent.

"At the meeting, the chief justice, who was chairing and had come alone without his full ConCourt bench, gave a directive which shocked the legal fraternity, constitutional bodies and the democratic sphere. He said any respondent supporting the applicant (Chamisa) will not be allowed to make submissions. The court will only accept submissions from any respondent supporting the first respondent (Mnangagwa). This is unbelievable. We are currently making consultations to see if we can legally challenge this, and if we can request the chief justice to recuse himself. We think he is conflicted.

"The chief justice's directive and role is more worrying when taken together with the relevant background and context of this case. We should remember that he (Malaba) was the one who swore in the first respondent (Mnangagwa) last November (after the coup).

"He went on to hear a constitutional application which sought access to the ConCourt to challenge Mnangagwa's ascendancy. As the same person who had sworn in Mnangagwa, thus giving him constitutional and legal legitimacy, Malaba should have recused himself, but he didn't.

"Now here we are again with him (Malaba) presiding over a court challenge to Mnangagwa's recent disputed election victory. We strongly believe there are grounds for him to recuse himself, given all this. We were perplexed and shocked by his directive which is unprecedented and unheard of."

Malaba's ruling, sitting in ConCourt chambers in the matter of Liberal Democrats and Others v Mnangagwa and Others, raised very serious legal and jurisprudential questions.

In this matter, two political parties named Liberal Democrats and Revolutionary Freedom Fighters, together with Vusumuzi Sibanda, Linda Masarira and Bongani Nyathi, sought direct access to the ConCourt to bring an application against Mnangagwa, Vice-President Constantino Chiwenga, the Zimbabwe Defence Forces, Speaker of the National Assembly and former president Robert Mugabe.

Malaba had to decide whether it was in the interest of justice that direct access should be given. The alternative for the applicants was to start their case in a lower court.

The essence of their case was that Mugabe's resignation on November 21, 2017 in the midst of a military coup which brought in Mnangagwa to power, was not free and voluntary.

They argued that it was a direct result of the military action of November 14, 2017 and the "presence of military vehicles in the streets of Harare between 14 and 21 November 2017". They also said the subsequent impeachment proceedings were "intended to aid and abet take-over of power by the military". Further, they challenged the constitutionality and legality of the assumption of power by Mnangagwa on November 24, 2017.

However, the applicants were in default on the date of the hearing. No one appeared on their behalf.

In order for Malaba to decide whether direct access should be granted, he had to consider the applicants' prospects of success before the ConCourt. In the process, the chief justice concluded that Mugabe had resigned of his own volition or free-will. He held that the resignation of Mugabe was voluntary as evidenced by the letter of resignation and the communication with the Speaker of the National Assembly on the day.

Malaba decided the legality of the coup relying on a court order issued without reasons by Judge President Justice George Chiweshe in the case Joseph Evurath Sibanda and Leonard Chikomba v President of the Republic of Zimbabwe, Robert Gabriel Mugabe N.O. and Minister of Defence and Commander of the Zimbabwe Defence Forces and Attorney-General of Zimbabwe (HC 10820/2017) on November 24 2017.

There is a rich history of case law within the Commonwealth, where there have been legal challenges to the unconstitutional overthrow of elected governments. These cases and incisive commentary on them are set out in an interesting book by Professor John Hatchard and Dr Tunde Ogowewo titled Tackling Unconstitutional Overthrow of Democracies: Emerging Trends in the Commonwealth.

Hatchard and Ogowewo develop a new theoretical construct - "the implicit bargain theory" - to explain the existing jurisprudence on coups. Their study critically examines the evolution of judicial decisions on the subject. In doing so, it also evaluates jurisprudential theories underpinning these judgments.

Most judges rely on the dodgy Dosso jurisprudence which can be traced to the judgment of the Pakistan Supreme Court in State v Dosso, a decision that has been termed "a carte blanche for treasonable conduct". Malaba and his colleagues almost certainly relied on this and also the doctrine of necessity to justify their decisions.

"To understand the nature of the existing jurisprudence on coups, it is important to understand what in fact produced it," Hatchard and Ogowewo write. "For this, a new theoretical construct - ‘the implicit bargain theory' - is introduced to tell the story.

"Judges are important players when there is a coup. The immediate effect of a coup is to eliminate two branches of government - the executive and the legislature. The judiciary is left intact.

"The judiciary is left intact for two reasons. First, because judicial affirmation of the regime of usurpers confers legitimacy on the usurpers. Second, because even usurpers need to govern in a system characterised by law and order, and an existing judicial system - even if tweaked - is indispensable."

Shumba, cited as one of the 25 respondents in the Chamisa case, yesterday said: "I am going ahead to file my papers. It is my constitutional right to do so."

Prior to the interview, Shumba had addressed a press conference and emphasised that he would challenge Malaba's directive.

"It does not matter whether I am a respondent or applicant; I have the right to be heard. According to Section 167(a), (b) and (c), rules of the ConCourt must allow a person when it is in the interest of justice with or without leave of the ConCourt to bring a constitutional matter directly to the court, to appeal directly to the ConCourt from any other court, to appear as a friend of the court," Shumba said. "I will not be intimidated to abandon my democratic and constitutional right."

- the independent


You May Like These Videos


There are no comments.

Latest stories

Mangudya walks out of meeting with Mthuli Ncube

by Staff reporter | 15 February 2019 | 345 Views

BREAKING: Prof. Calistus Ndlovu declared National Hero

by Mandla Ndlovu | 15 February 2019 | 183 Views

Mnangagwa attends Zimbabwe International Research Symposium

by Staff reporter | 15 February 2019 | 176 Views

Mines tragedy declared national disaster

by Staff reporter | 15 February 2019 | 202 Views

Zimbabwe now facing condom crisis

by Staff reporter | 15 February 2019 | 208 Views

Zimbabwe looks to tackle telecom fraud with technology

by Agencies | 15 February 2019 | 116 Views

Joshua Nkomo was a dictator?

by Mandla Ndlovu | 15 February 2019 | 167 Views

Re-colonising Zimbabwe will not work

by Gift Mashoko | 15 February 2019 | 129 Views

Chamisa saddened by Battlefields mine tragedy

by ZimLive | 15 February 2019 | 132 Views

Tsvangirai was duped by Mnangagwa

by Staff reporter | 15 February 2019 | 191 Views

2 300 ZUPCO buses offered to Zimbabwe

by Mandla Ndlovu | 15 February 2019 | 162 Views

Zanu-PF a sanctuary for thieves

by AT Kadada | 15 February 2019 | 145 Views

The Mnangagwa regime

by Louisa Brooke-Holland | 15 February 2019 | 159 Views

Banks plunge into fresh crisis

by Staff reporter | 15 February 2019 | 174 Views

Ex-MDC MP faces jail over bank loan

by Staff reporter | 15 February 2019 | 136 Views

Human Rights petitions AU over Zimbabwe

by Staff reporter | 15 February 2019 | 123 Views

'Is Mnangagwa's govt pro-poor or Queen B?'

by Staff reporter | 15 February 2019 | 157 Views

Jilted man demands sex or $1 000

by Staff reporter | 15 February 2019 | 133 Views

Number plates shortage: Cops harass motorists

by Staff reporter | 15 February 2019 | 128 Views

Calls for Zimbabwe to join Rand Monetary Union grow

by Staff reporter | 15 February 2019 | 101 Views

Prophet Magaya and wife did not pay tax on mega salaries

by ZimLive | 15 February 2019 | 111 Views

US cannot be our national dialogue referee

by Christine Lethokuhle Mabhena | 15 February 2019 | 206 Views

The EU Parliament resolutions on Zimbabwe read like Chamisa's script

by Brightface Mutema | 15 February 2019 | 217 Views

Botswana NGOs condemns Zim army for killings

by Mandla Ndlovu | 15 February 2019 | 112 Views

Government committed to implementing reforms

by Gift Mashoko | 15 February 2019 | 201 Views

ZCLDN holds drug masterplan roundtable

by ZCLDN | 15 February 2019 | 102 Views

PHOTOS: Wicknell Chivayo visits Mtukudzi's grave

by Mandla Ndlovu | 15 February 2019 | 188 Views

Zimbabwe not yet ready for national dialogue

by Terence Simbi | 15 February 2019 | 181 Views

'Investor interest in 2nd Zimbabwe fuel pipeline grows'

by Staff reporter | 15 February 2019 | 145 Views

RioZim resumes operations

by Ndou Paul | 15 February 2019 | 144 Views

Fears of imminent maize meal price increases

by GMAZ | 15 February 2019 | 141 Views

Zimbabwe looks to tackle telecom fraud with technology

by Global Voice Group (GVG) | 15 February 2019 | 134 Views

Advocate Jacob Mudenda offside

by Kucaca Phulu | 15 February 2019 | 161 Views

Government silence on battlefields disaster a disgrace

by Jacob Mafume | 15 February 2019 | 119 Views

Haru Mutasa denied UK Visa

by Staff reporter | 15 February 2019 | 145 Views

Chamisa to bring everyone to Harare for a Mother of All Demonstrations

by Staff reportet | 15 February 2019 | 220 Views